as they all provide necessary input for the investment decisions. This ensures that both financial and non-financial information is collected, analysed, and processed within the same department
and the optimal business decision is taken. For more details, please see the Supervisory Board report for the year 2024.</i><br><br>3.3. Companies participating in the WIG20, mWIG40 or sWIG80 index appoint an internal auditor to head the internal audit function in compliance with generally accepted international standards for the professional practice of internal auditing. In other companies which do not appoint an internal auditor who meets such requirements, the audit committee (or the supervisory board if it performs the functions of the audit committee) assesses on an annual basis whether such person should be appointed. <br><u><strong>The Company does not apply this principle.</strong></u><br><i>The Audit Committee has performed a thorough and continuous review of the internal risk management systems, internal audit function, controlling and legal compliance policies, throughout the year and also during its on-site visits in May and November 2024. The assessment includes the evaluation of the existing processes in place, human resources, its competences, and responsibilities as well as the reporting structure within the organization. The chairman of the Audit Committee performed the analysis through the consultations with the responsible personnel (the management, CFO, COO, the head of risk, finance director, the head of accounting and consolidation, and the head of compliance). He reviewed the procedures and evaluated whether adequate resources are in place and discussed relevant topics with external auditors. He observed that the finance and controlling departments are stabilised and robust and sufficient human resources are allocated. While a bulk of the finance processes remain to be put into a more formal setting, the Audit Committee concluded that the current measures with respect to internal audit function are more or less adequate and there is no indication of any fraud. They recommended that a stronger formalization of the internal audit function (either through hiring of an appropriate candidate or sourced out externally with the consulting firms) is desirable, in line with the recommendation published in the 2023 annual report. The focus is on elimination of manual errors. The results of this analysis were discussed with the Board of Directors.</i><br><br>3.4. The remuneration of persons responsible for risk and compliance management and of the head of internal audit should depend on the performance of delegated tasks rather than short-term results of the company.<br><u><strong>The principle is applied. </strong></u><br><br>3.5. Persons responsible for risk and compliance management report directly to the president or other member of the management board.<br><u><strong>The principle is applied. </strong></u><br><br>3.6. The head of internal audit reports organisationally to the president of the management board and functionally to the chair of the audit committee or the chair of the supervisory board if the supervisory board performs the functions of the audit committee.<br><u><strong>The Company does not apply this principle.</strong></u><br><i>This principle is not applied as there is no separate internal audit unit in the Company, there is no head of the internal audit department, who could be placed in the organisational structure as required
by this principle. Further explanation can be found in comment 3.1. and 3.3.</i><br><br>3.7. Principles 3.4 to 3.6 apply also to members of the company’s group which are material to its activity if they appoint persons to perform such tasks.<br><u><strong>The principle is applied. </strong></u><br><u><strong>Comments of the Company on the mode of application of the principle.</strong></u><br><i>All the companies within the Group are following the same procedures and adhere to the same risk management, controlling, compliance and internal audit procedures.</i><br><br>3.8. The person responsible for internal audit or the management board if such function is not performed separately in the company reports to the supervisory board at least once per year with their assessment of the efficiency of the systems and functions referred to in principle 3.1 and tables a relevant report.<br><u><strong>The principle is applied. </strong></u><br><br>3.9. The supervisory board monitors the efficiency of the systems and functions referred to in principle 3.1 among others on the basis of reports provided periodically by the persons responsible for the functions and the company’s management board, and makes annual assessment of the efficiency of such systems and functions according to principle 2.11.3. Where the company has an audit committee, the audit committee monitors the efficiency of the systems and functions referred to in principle 3.1, which however does not release the supervisory board from the annual assessment of the efficiency of such systems and functions.<br><u><strong>The principle is applied. </strong></u><br><br>3.10. Companies participating in the WIG20, mWIG40 or sWIG80 index have the internal audit function reviewed at least once every five years by an independent auditor appointed with the participation of the audit committee.<br><u><strong>The principle not applicable.</strong></u><br><i>The Company is not included in WIG80 </i><br><br><br>GENERAL MEETING, SHAREHOLDER RELATIONS<br><br>4.1. Companies should enable their shareholders to participate in a general meeting by means of electronic communication (e-meeting) if justified by the expectations of shareholders notified to the company, provided that the company is in a position to provide the technical infrastructure necessary for such general meeting to proceed.<br><u><strong>The Company does not apply this principle.</strong></u><br><i>Historically, there has never been an interest expressed by minority shareholders to participate in a general meeting by means of electronic communication (e-meeting). While the company does not offer participation at the general meeting through electronic means of communication, it provides its shareholders an option to (i) vote in advance on all resolutions on the agenda of a general meeting; and (ii) ask questions in advance, in order to ensure full participation of all shareholders. The shareholders also have an option to participate in quarterly investors podcast where they can pose questions and learn in detail about financial results, business development and strategy.</i><br><br>4.2. Companies set the place and date and the form of a general meeting so as to enable the participation of the highest possible number of shareholders. For that purpose, companies strive to ensure that the cancellation of a general meeting, change of its date or break in its proceedings take place only if justified and do not prevent or limit the exercising of the shareholders’ rights to participate in the general meeting.<br><u><strong>The principle is applied. </strong></u><br><br>4.3. Companies provide a public real-life broadcast of the general meeting.<br><u><strong>The Company does not apply this principle.</strong></u><br><i>Please see the explanation provided in the principle 4.1.</i><br><br>4.4. Presence of representatives of the media is allowed at general meetings.<br><u><strong>The principle is applied. </strong></u><br><br>4.5. If the management board becomes aware a general meeting being convened pursuant to Article 399 § 2 – 4 of the Commercial Companies Code, the management board immediately takes steps which it is required to take in order to organise and conduct the general meeting. The foregoing applies also where a general meeting is convened under authority granted by the registration court according to Article 400 § 3 of the Commercial Companies Code.<br><u><strong>The principle is applied. </strong></u><br><u><strong>Comments of the Company on the mode of application of the principle.</strong></u><br><i>Annual General Meetings of the Company are organized by the Board of Directors within the time periods designated by the applicable laws. Extraordinary General Meetings were in the past organized when the need arose. Throughout the existence of the Company, there has not been a case when the Board of Directors failed to act and the General Meeting (ordinary or extraordinary) would have to be organized by the Supervisory Board or shareholder(s) based on the court’s authorization as presumed by Article 400 of the Polish Commercial Code.
Also, no shareholder has ever used its right to convene an extraordinary general meeting.
In the past the Company indicated that this principle is not applied, as the Polish commercial code regulations are not applicable to the Company and hence there is no obligation to follow those regulations and remain compliant with this principle. However, to demonstrate the dedication of the Company to stay compliant with the Best Practises 2021 of the Warsaw Stock Exchange and upon analysis of the requirements of the Polish regulations specified in this principle, and comparing them to the respective Dutch regulations, the management concluded that the Company has not violated those regulations during the reporting period.
Furthermore, the Dutch Civil Code (which is the law of the Home Member State, applicable to the Company) stipulates similar rights of the Supervisory Board and shareholders to convene the general meeting in the event the Board of Directors does not act. It goes further and provides even more protection to the shareholders. Under Dutch Civil Code, shareholders representing at least 10% of issued capital may ask the judge to grant a provisional relief to convene an extraordinary general meeting.
If the Board of Directors or Supervisory Board fail to organize an annual general meeting (or if they fail to convene a general meeting when equity had decreased dramatically), any shareholder is authorized to ask the judge for a provisional relief to convene a general meeting.</i><br><br>4.6. To help shareholders participating in a general meeting to vote on resolutions with adequate understanding, draft resolutions of the general meeting concerning matters and decisions other than points of order should contain a justification, unless it follows from documentation tabled to the general meeting. If a matter is put on the agenda of the general meeting at the request of a shareholder or shareholders, the management board requests presentation of the justification of the proposed resolution, unless previously presented by such shareholder or shareholders.<br><u><strong>The principle is applied. </strong></u><br><br>4.7. The supervisory board issues opinions on draft resolutions put by the management board on the agenda of the general meeting.<br><u><strong>The principle is applied. </strong></u><br><br>4.8. Draft resolutions of the general meeting on matters put on the agenda of the general meeting should be tabled by shareholders no later than three days before the general meeting.<br><u><strong>The principle is applied. </strong></u><br><br>4.9. If the general meeting is to appoint members of the supervisory board or members of the supervisory board for a new term of office:<br><br>4.9.1. candidates for members of the supervisory board should be nominated with a notice necessary for shareholders present at the general meeting to make an informed decision and in any case no later than three days before the general meeting; the names of candidates and all related documents should be immediately published on the company’s website;<br><u><strong>The principle is applied. </strong></u><br><br>4.9.2. candidates for members of the supervisory board make a declaration concerning fulfilment of the requirements for members of the audit committee referred to in the Act of 11 May 2017 on Auditors, Audit Firms and Public Supervision and having actual and material relations with any shareholder who holds at least 5% of the total vote in the company.<br><u><strong>The principle is applied. </strong></u><br><br>4.10. Any exercise of the rights of shareholders or the way in which they exercise their rights must not hinder the proper functioning of the governing bodies of the company.<br><u><strong>The principle is applied. </strong></u><br><br>4.11. Members of the management board and members of the supervisory board participate in a general meeting, at the location of the meeting or via means of bilateral real-time electronic communication, as necessary to speak on matters discussed by the general meeting and answer questions asked at the general meeting. The management board presents to participants of an annual general meeting the financial results of the company and other relevant information, including non-financial information, contained in the financial statements to be approved by the general meeting. The management board presents key events of the last financial year, compares presented data with previous years, and presents the degree of implementation of the plans for the last year.<br><u><strong>The principle is applied. </strong></u><br><br>4.12. Resolutions of the general meeting concerning an issue of shares with subscription rights should specify the issue price or the mechanism of setting the price or authorise the competent body to set the price prior to the subscription right record date within a timeframe necessary for investors to make decisions.<br><u><strong>The principle is applied. </strong></u><br><br>4.13. Resolutions concerning a new issue of shares with the exclusion of subscription rights which grant pre-emptive rights for new issue shares to selected shareholders or other entities may pass subject at least to the following three criteria:<br><strong>a)</strong> the company has a rational, economically justified need to urgently raise capital or the share issue is related to rational, economically justified transactions, among others such as a merger with or the take-over of another company, or the shares are to be taken up under an incentive scheme established by the company;<br><strong>b)</strong> the persons granted the pre-emptive right are to be selected according to objective general criteria;<br><strong>c)</strong> the purchase price of the shares is in a rational relation with the current share price of the company or is to be determined in book-building on the market.<br><u><strong>The principle is applied. </strong></u><br><br>4.14. Companies should strive to distribute their profits by paying out dividends. Companies may retain all their earnings subject to any of the following criteria:<br><strong>a)</strong> the earnings are minimal and consequently the dividend would be immaterial in relation to the value of the shares;<br><strong>b)</strong> the company reports uncovered losses from previous years and the earnings are used to reduce such losses;<br><strong>c)</strong> the company can demonstrate that investment of the earnings will generate tangible benefits for the shareholders;<br><strong>d)</strong> the company generates insufficient cash flows to pay out dividends;<br><strong>e)</strong> a dividend payment would substantially increase the risk to covenants under the company’s binding credit facilities or terms of bond issue;<br><strong>f)</strong> retention of the company’s earnings follows recommendations of the authority which supervises the company by virtue of its business activity.<br><u><strong>The principle is applied. </strong></u><br><br><br>CONFLICT OF INTEREST, RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS<br><br>5.1. Members of the management board and members of the supervisory board notify the management board or the supervisory board, respectively, of any conflict of interest which has arisen or may arise, and refrain from discussions on the issue which may give rise to such a conflict of interest in their case.<br><u><strong>The principle is applied. </strong></u><br><br>5.2. Where a member of the management board or a member of the supervisory board concludes that a decision of the management board or the supervisory board, respectively, is in conflict with the interest of the company, he or she should request that the minutes of the management board or supervisory board meeting show his or her dissenting opinion.<br><u><strong>The principle is applied. </strong></u><br><br>5.3. No shareholder should have preference over other shareholders in related party transactions. The foregoing also concerns transactions concluded by the company’s shareholders with members of the company’s group.<br><u><strong>The principle is applied. </strong></u><br><br>5.4. Companies may buy back their own shares only in a procedure which respects the rights of all shareholders.<br><u><strong>The principle is applied. </strong></u><br><br>5.5. If a transaction concluded by a company with its related party requires the consent of the supervisory board, before giving its consent the supervisory board assesses whether to ask a prior opinion of a third party which can provide valuation of the transaction and review its economic impact.<br><u><strong>The principle is applied. </strong></u><br><br>5.6. If a related party transaction requires the consent of the general meeting, the supervisory board issues an opinion on the rationale of such transaction. In that case, the supervisory board assesses whether to ask a prior opinion of a third party referred to in principle 5.5.<br><u><strong>The principle is applied. </strong></u><br><br>5.7. If a decision concerning the company’s significant transaction with a related party is made by the general meeting, the company should give all shareholders access to information necessary to assess the impact of the transaction on the interest of the company before the decision is made, including an opinion of the supervisory board referred to in principle 5.6.<br><u><strong>The principle is applied. </strong></u><br><br><br>REMUNERATION<br><br>6.1. The remuneration of members of the management board and members of the supervisory board and key managers should be sufficient to attract, retain and motivate persons with skills necessary for proper management and supervision of the company. The level of remuneration should be adequate to the tasks and responsibilities delegated to individuals and their resulting accountability.<br><u><strong>The principle is applied. </strong></u><br><br>6.2. Incentive schemes should be constructed in a way necessary among others to tie the level of remuneration of members of the company’s management board and key managers to the actual long-term standing of the company measured by its financial and non-financial results as well as long-term shareholder value creation, sustainable development and the company’s stability.<br><u><strong>The principle is applied. </strong></u><br><u><strong>Comments of the Company on the mode of application of the principle.</strong></u><br><i>The Company's management board as well as the key managers receive a monthly bonus in form of the Company's shares, which alligns their goals with the long-term shareholders' value creation. Apart from that, there is an additional incentive scheme which links remuneration of the key managers to the financial results of the Company, its growth and stability. </i><br><br>6.3. If companies’ incentive schemes include a stock option programme for managers, the implementation of the stock option programme should depend on the beneficiaries’ achievement, over a period of at least three years, of pre-defined, realistic financial and non-financial targets and sustainable development goals adequate to the company, and the share price or option exercise price for the beneficiaries cannot differ from the value of the shares at the time when such programme was approved.<br><u><strong>The principle is applied. </strong></u><br><u><strong>Comments of the Company on the mode of application of the principle.</strong></u><br><i>The Companies' incentive schemes does not include a stock option programme for managers. The Company maintains an Employee Share Purchase Program (“ESPP”). According the ESPP the employee receives a monthly bonus of 10% to his gross salary minus taxes, which is paid in form of the Company's shares transferred to each employee’s securities account. ESPP programme does not depend on the beneficiaries' achievement. The shares are transferred to employees at the average market price without any discount. In the Management's view ESPP aligns goals of the employees with the long-term value creation of its shareholders therefore is viewed as an effective and fair substitute of stock option programme. </i><br><br>6.4. As the supervisory board performs its responsibilities on a continuous basis, the remuneration of supervisory board members cannot depend on the number of meetings held. The remuneration of members of committees, in particular the audit committee, should take into account additional workload on the committee.<br><u><strong>The principle is applied. </strong></u><br><br>6.5. The level of remuneration of supervisory board members should not depend on the company’s short-term results.<br><u><strong>The principle is applied. </strong></u><br><br><br>
Źródło:Komunikaty spółek (EBI)
























































