Pytania do zarządu

Jak się czują z tym, że rok temu opchnęli akcje w emisji po 2.3zł, a teraz "przyznają osobie trzeciej prawo do nabycia akcji" po 1.5zł?
Jak sobie wyobrażają dalsze budowanie zaufania inwestorów po zrobieniu takiego czegoś?


Czy w świetle raczej negatywnego odbioru wczesnej wersji gry (komnetarze ze Steam wklejone poniżej) pójście all-in (przez co rozumiem zaciągniecie pożyczki przez spółkę na prace nad Nemesis Distress) jest dobrym krokiem?


- "I definitely do not like what they have done so far."

- "You are not the only one, which is why only the people who have gotten involved in the alpha / beta testing are all that's left."
- "The game was fun but somewhat barebones and can't see myself returning to it that often. I doubt the playerbase will be there - anyway unless this happens to go free to play with some sort of progression."
- "I really don't know if the game works with many other players, but right now I'm not that hooked to play it and I'm not sure more players can improve the flaws of missing atmosphere due to the lack of some auditive and graphical things"
- "Tbh, the way it looks now I might not end up getting the game myself, took it off my wish-list since I was hoping for a true / close to true adaptation of the original game."

- "By going in this direction away from the original trailer, and not doing a close to true adaptation of the actual board game... You're going to lose out on most Nemesis fans, which will kill this games potential from the very start.
Just as a warning, I know this is a very low budget adaptation, but keep in mind if you lose the core buyers, you are not going to get the casuals who would end up getting this game because of its cult popularity."